Michael Halliday - Language evolving: Some systemic functional reflections on the history of meaning
Student
Time Lapse
Concept
Suparo Paula
0:00 a 0:15
-Language evolves with its contact with the environment which is composed of physical and social processes that shape and define human life.
-Semiotizasing the human experience is a uniquely human attribute.
-The children’s developmental steps match with the progression of contexts in which meanings are exchanged. .
Madelaine Bezenzette
0:15 to 0:30
-Develop knowledge
Common sense Knowledge: Comes from home, a neighborhood of the child.
Educational Knowledge: Becomes the discourse of the primary school.
Technical Knowledge: Discourse of the secondary school.
Language has evolved through time with the evolution of the human species so that to cope with its needs
language is organized around two kinds of
meanings: the ideational and the interpersonal. A third metafunctional component, the textual, give relevance to the first two.
Belen Porco
0:30 to :0:40
Destruction of knowledge: The polarization, the gaps in our society between what we know and what we don't’ replacing what we have and what we have not.
Evolution of knowledge: Different way of knowing: codifying, transmitting,
A genre has played an important part is narrative
Proverbs: Traditional repository os common sense in everyday life situations. They construed knowledge in isolated doses, they don’t combine patterns, narratives can do this.
Juan Ignacio Fernández
0:40 to :45
-Grammatical metaphor is the actual phase of knowledge and it creates a parallel universe of virtual processes and virtual entities. All of these processes are good for thinking.
Macarena Garcia
45’ to 1:07:00
-Meaning potential changes over time, it always increases and it is modulated and that it is transmitted to the next generation
-All human beings are able to develop the meaning potential in our brain. The meaning potential expands as we learn different languages
System:
-Writing increases the meaning potential. Writing is a contextualized process and its meaning arises throughout the building of language structures and knowledge
-Any human being achieves the meaning potential of the whole system
-Human beings try to improve the language by making new designs
-The meaning potential adds new meanings and it is a significant factor
-Translators provide multilingualism by using different target language discourses and discourse patterns of other languages as well.
What is it? → It is the specific claim your essay supports
How it is composed? → It is composed of three parts.
1) The subject: It is related to the topic of our essay. What is our essay going to be about? Be careful! 🔔 Knowing the topic is not the same as knowing what you are going to write about in your paper. For example, you can say that you want to write about computers, but that is not enough for a thesis statement.
2) The precise opinion: It is our opinion or claim on that topic. Taking into account the example from above, What do you have to say about computers? Are they good for our environment or not?
3)The blueprint of reasons: It has to do with showing your readers how you plan to argue and support your opinion about that claim. Keep in mind 🔔 the fact that your reasons should be different from one and the other so that they do not overlap the previous one.
Where do these reasons go?
Each reason can go at the end of the Thesis Statement, at the beginning of the Thesis Statement or they can be simply listed in the Thesis Statement.
1.I saw around Velva a release from what was like slavery to the tyrannical soil, release from the ignorance that darkens the soul and from the loneliness that corrodes it. In this generation my Velva friends have rejoined the general American society that their pioneering fathers left behind when they first made the barren trek in the days of the wheat rush. As I sit here in Washington writing this, I can feel their nearness. (from Eric Sevareid, "Velva, North Dakota")
Answer:
The answer Many politicians deplore the passing of the old family- sized farm, but I'm not so sure. is correct.
Explanation:
Sevareid argues that farming is destructive as a way of life, no matter what romantic notions are attached to it. He is not writing about the productivity of farms, about his own life story ("I grew up on a family-sized farm..."), and his main point is not that people moved away from the cities in the late the nineteenth century.
2. The first is the wear-and-tear hypothesis that
suggests the body eventually succumbs to the environmental insults of life. The
second is the notion that we have an internal clock which is genetically
programmed to run down. Supporters of the wear-and-tear theory maintain that
the very practice of breathing causes us to age because inhaled oxygen produces
toxic by-products. Advocates of the internal clock theory believe that
individual cells are told to stop dividing and thus eventually to die by, for
example, hormones produced by the brain or by their own genes. (from Debra
Blank, "The Eternal Quest" [edited]).
Answer:
The answer There are two broad theories concerning what triggers a human's inevitable decline to death. is correct.
Explanation:
This paragraph is a straightforward description of two possibilities, neither of which is preferred over the other. In this case, it would be wrong to mention only one of the possibilities (the "internal time clock") in the topic sentence, or to treat it as a philosophical discussion of death itself ("we all must die..."). As for the biology professor, He or she might very well have given an interesting lecture, but that has nothing to do with the content of the paragraph.
3. The strictest military discipline imaginable is
still looser
than that prevailing in the average assembly-line.
The soldier, at
worst, is still able to exercise the highest
conceivable functions of freedom
-- that is, he or she
is permitted to steal and to kill. No discipline
prevailing
in peace gives him or her anything remotely resembling
this. The soldier is, in war, in the position of a free adult;
in peace he or she is
almost always in the position of a child.
In war all things are excused by
success, even violations
of discipline. In peace, speaking generally, success
is
inconceivable except as a function of discipline.
(from
H.L. Mencken, "Reflections on War" [edited]).
Answer:
The answer We commonly look on the discipline of war as vastly more rigid than any discipline necessary in time of peace, but this is an error. is correct.
Explanation:
The topic sentence must emphasise the comparative nature of the paragraph. Mencken does argue that soldiers need discipline, but this is not all he argues in this paragraph. Likewise, while soldiers may well serve an important function in wartime, and while they may well be able to compete well in peacetime, neither of these points is discussed in the paragraph.